AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Notonagoro emphasizes human nature as monopluralis, while Drijarkara as persona. However, both have differences in the things emphasized. Notonagoro sees humans as monopluralists, while Drijarkara sees humans as singular ( kedwitunggalan). Equally, both see humans not as a single entity. This study found that Notonagoro and Drijarkara had similarities and differences in formulating human nature as ontological basis of Pancasila. Therefore, the understanding of Pancasila must begin with understanding of human nature. With the basic understanding of Pancasila is a philosophical system and human as its ontological basis, the philosophy of Pancasila can be well understood through an understanding of human nature. For this reason, this study uses a comparison method. This article aims to compare the conception of human nature according to Notonagoro and Drijarkara and their implications for the development of the philosophy of Pancasila. Human Notonagoro Drijarkara Comparation Philosophy of Pancasila.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |